id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
3636	Supporting MSL 3.2.2	Francesco Casella	Adrian Pop	"The release plan for MSL 3.2.2 is found here:

https://trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1867

The next major deadline is Feb 19, when a RC will be released. The Beta 1 revision was tagged on Feb 12, and nothing substantial has been done on trunk since then, so the Beta 1 is roughly equivalent to the trunk.

I have done a quick regression between

https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/MSL_trunk/BuildModelRecursive.html

and

https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/MSL_3.2.1/BuildModelRecursive.html

The front end is ok, but there are some problems with back-end, code generation and simulation which affect 23 models (9 existing ones and 14 new ones). I haven't counted problems that already affected MSL 3.2.1, though it would be of course nice to solve them as well. But I think it is imperative that OMC doesn't show a worse performance on MSL 3.2.2 than it does on MSL 3.2.1.

You can find a summary of the analysis in the attached spreadsheet.

I would urge the developers to look at this problems and report if they are caused by bad Modelica code (that Dymola handles somehow, so developers don't care), or if they are caused by some omc bug.
In the first case, please report to me and/or open a ticket on trac.modelica.org.

In the second case, it would be nice to have the problem fixed by the time MSL 3.2.2 is released (planned date: March 11 2016), or even better for the 1.9.4 release.

I would also suggest that, once MSL 3.2.2 is out, we release a new version of OMC that uses it ASAP.

Note that DS (Dymola), Modelon (JModelica) and ITI (SimulationX) have taken a very active stand on https://trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1867. It would be weird if we didn't, as we are aiming at becoming the reference Modelica compiler.
"	defect	closed	blocker	2.0.0	*unknown*		wontfix	MSL v3.2.2-build.3-release