Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #2490


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2013-11-24T00:23:48Z (11 years ago)
Author:
Dietmar Winkler
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #2490 – Description

    v1 v2  
    1 For some time now OM supports MathJax, which is great. Now today I had to add this [m:comment:23:ticket:78 comment] to the Modelica tracker. This lead me to play around with MathJax in my library again. Wouldn't it be great if we could load `MathJax.js` from a local URI to make the documentation of the library independent on online resources?
     1For some time now OMEdit supports MathJax, which is great. Now today I had to add this [m:comment:23:ticket:78 comment] to the Modelica tracker. This lead me to play around with MathJax in my library again. Wouldn't it be great if we could load `MathJax.js` from a local URI to make the documentation of the library independent of online resources?
    22
    33Example, instead of writing
    … …  
    2121which means I can ship my library with a MathJax version I know works and don't depend on network connections.
    2222
    23 Another step would then be to be able to enable the MathJax rendering globally without having to add the `<script>...</script>` part into every Modelica file. Could well be a configuration in OMEdit but I would actually prefer it to specify it in my Library instead.
     23Another step would then be to be able to enable the MathJax rendering globally without having to add the `<script>...</script>` part into every Modelica file. Could well be a configuration in OMEdit but I would actually prefer to specify it in my Library instead.
    2424