Changes between Version 5 and Version 7 of Ticket #2696


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2015-04-19T16:39:42Z (10 years ago)
Author:
massimo ceraolo
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #2696

    • Property Milestone 1.9.2 → 1.9.3

  • Ticket #2696 – Description

    v5 v7  
    77
    88This is suboptimal because it uses too much of the valuable plot space.
    9 To me, the optimal solution might be either to write the numbers on the axes between -800 and 800 and adding somewhere in the vertical axis "*10^3" or -8 and 8 and label the axis with "*10^5"
     9To me, the optimal solution might be either to write the numbers on the axes between -800 and 800 and adding somewhere in the vertical axis "*10^3^" or -8 and 8 and label the axis with "*10^5^"
     10I mean, when numbers are very large or very small, they should be displayed in scientific or engineering format, but the corresponding power of ten is to be put once on the axis.
     11In case units of measure are used, engineering prefixes (e.g. m for *10^-3^, k for *10^3^, M for *10^6^, ...) should be used
    1012
    11 I mean, when numbers are very large or very small, they should be displayed in scientific or engineering format, but the corresponding power of ten is to be put once on the axis.
    12