Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#4742 closed defect
A very wrong result without any warning or error message — at Version 5
| Reported by: | massimo ceraolo | Owned by: | somebody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 2.0.0 |
| Component: | New Instantiation | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | Willi Braun, Lennart Ochel |
Description (last modified by )
The attached package test contains model testOM.
This model contains the sine-wave source "fem". When it is simulated, the model compiles and runs without warnings and errors, but the shape of fem is totally different from a sine wave!
I propose blocker priority since this is really tricky because the user should be allowed to trust a result obtained without a warning.
tested on a Windows system using
OMEdit v1.13.0-dev-95-g4eb7a19 (64-bit)
Connected to v1.13.0-dev-380-g8b177b9 (64-bit)
Change History (9)
by , 7 years ago
| Attachment: | IssueFem.mo added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
In "fem.png" what I gat using
OMEdit v1.13.0-dev-95-g4eb7a19 (64-bit)
Connected to v1.13.0-dev-380-g8b177b9 (64-bit)
on Win
by , 7 years ago
comment:4 by , 7 years ago
I have a simpler test showing the issue. I attach simpler.mo and simpler.png to ease debug.
by , 7 years ago
| Attachment: | simplerTest.mo added |
|---|
by , 7 years ago
| Attachment: | simpler.png added |
|---|
comment:5 by , 7 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
I ran this model with OMEdit v1.13.0-dev-94-gbfd3af3 (64-bit), connected to v1.13.0-dev-357-g105aad9 (64-bit), which is one week old. The simulation runs for 0.06 seconds and
fem.p.vshows a nice sinusoid with 40 V amplitude and three full periods.@ceraolo, are you experiencing problems with a later nightly?