Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #5738, comment 10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2019-12-09T23:40:39Z (5 years ago)
Author:
Francesco Casella

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #5738, comment 10

    initial v1  
    1313> it will fail, instead of saying that the model has `n` variables and equations. But whether the parameter has an `Evaluate`-annotation or not doesn't matter in that case.
    1414
    15 Yeah, I understood this is the case. However, it is normally the case that integer parameters such as number of nodes, volumes, elements and the like have some default (e.g. {{{n = 1}}} or {{{n = 2}}}, corresponding to "simple implementation" or "minimum legal approximation", which can then be used for testing.
     15Yeah, I understood this is the case. However, it is normally the case that integer parameters such as number of nodes, volumes, elements and the like have some default (e.g. {{{n = 1}}} or {{{n = 2}}}), corresponding to "simple implementation" or "minimum legal approximation", which can then be used for testing.
    1616
    17 To the contrary, physical parameters such as the length of a rod or the mass of a body do not and should not have a default binding, because there is no such thing as a default lenght of a generic rod or default mass of a generitc body.
     17To the contrary, physical parameters such as the length of a rod or the mass of a body do not and should not have a default binding, because there is no such thing as a default lenght of a generic rod or default mass of a generic body.