Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #5776
- Timestamp:
- 2020-01-09T13:42:47Z (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #5776 – Description
v2 v3 6 6 7 7 If common duplication is done, i.e. Dymola's and OM's (once #4536 is solved) this would create a dependency of Package2 on Package1 which not always is welcome. It also stays hidden and annoys non-expert (but also expert) users. 8 In fact, if one opens Model1 in Package 1 and unloads Package2, a red-box appears in the place of subMod in Package2.Model1.8 In fact, if one unloads Package 1 and opens Model1 in Package 2, a red-box appears in the place of subMod in Package2.Model1. 9 9 10 10 What I suggest is to allow, as an option, to "include in-package dependencies". I this case, duplicating Model1 should automatically duplicate also SubModel1.