Opened 14 years ago

Last modified 14 years ago

#1368 closed defect (fixed)

Zero crossings in algorithms in for loops are generated wrong

Reported by: Adrian Pop Owned by: Adrian Pop
Priority: high Milestone: White December
Component: Simulation Code Generation Version:
Keywords: Cc: Adrian Pop, Adrian Pop, Frenkel TUD, Willi Braun

Description

This is one of the issues with codegen for Modelica.Electrical.Digital.Examples.Multiplexer.

model X
 parameter Integer n = 4;
 parameter Real x[n] = {1, 2, 3, 4};
 Real y[n];
algorithm
 for i in 1:n loop
  y[i] := if time > x[i] then x[i] else i;
 end for;
end X;

gets you in the C code:

  array_alloc_scalar_real_array(&tmp10, 4, (modelica_real)$Px$lB1$rB, (modelica_real)$Px$lB2$rB, (modelica_real)$Px$lB3$rB, (modelica_real)$Px$lB4$rB);
  ZEROCROSSING(0, Greater(time, (tmp10[(modelica_integer)$Pi])));

which is obviously wrong, you should have 4 zero crossings.
I think that BackendDAECreate.collectZeroCrossings should expand for loops
in algorithms and then collect zero crossings. However, if the for loop range
is not a parameter, and you cannot expand the for loop, then i don't know how
to deal with this. Any suggestions??

Change History (0)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.