#3692 closed defect (invalid)
PNlib coverage drop
| Reported by: | lochel | Owned by: | lochel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 1.9.4 |
| Component: | Run-time | Version: | v1.9.4-dev-nightly |
| Keywords: | Cc: | adrpo |
Description
The recent commits broke the PNlib coverage test. The model PNlib.Examples.Models.Printing.Model worked with OpenModelica v1.9.4-dev.beta1.115+g31eaa49 and failed with OpenModelica v1.9.4-dev.beta1.121+g5a950a9.
Please compare the recent coverage test results:
https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/history/PNlib-2016-02-17.html
https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/history/PNlib-2016-02-18.html
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by lochel
- Owner changed from someone to lochel
- Status changed from new to accepted
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by lochel
- Resolution set to invalid
- Status changed from accepted to closed
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by adrpo
Good to know as I'm building 1.9.4-dev.beta2 :)
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by lochel
I've added a workaround to the PNlib. However, I've no idea why the changes matter at all. Adrian, what do you think?
comment:5 Changed 9 years ago by adrpo
That is rather strange, they should basically be equivalent but somehow they aren't??!!
How does the flatten code looks for the different variants?
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by sjoelund.se
- Milestone changed from 1.9.4 to 1.9.4-1.9.x
Milestone renamed
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by sjoelund.se
- Milestone changed from 1.9.4-1.9.x to 1.9.4
Milestone renamed
The issue is related to changes in the PNlib and not to changes in OpenModelica.