#3692 closed defect (invalid)
PNlib coverage drop
| Reported by: | Lennart Ochel | Owned by: | Lennart Ochel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 1.9.4 |
| Component: | Run-time | Version: | v1.9.4-dev-nightly |
| Keywords: | Cc: | Adrian Pop |
Description
The recent commits broke the PNlib coverage test. The model PNlib.Examples.Models.Printing.Model worked with OpenModelica v1.9.4-dev.beta1.115+g31eaa49 and failed with OpenModelica v1.9.4-dev.beta1.121+g5a950a9.
Please compare the recent coverage test results:
https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/history/PNlib-2016-02-17.html
https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries/history/PNlib-2016-02-18.html
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
| Owner: | changed from to |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → accepted |
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | accepted → closed |
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
I've added a workaround to the PNlib. However, I've no idea why the changes matter at all. Adrian, what do you think?
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
That is rather strange, they should basically be equivalent but somehow they aren't??!!
How does the flatten code looks for the different variants?
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
The issue is related to changes in the PNlib and not to changes in OpenModelica.