#6100 closed defect (fixed)
OM does not read correctly StackRC from MSL. 4.0
Reported by: | massimo ceraolo | Owned by: | Adrian Pop |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 1.19.0 |
Component: | NF API | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Model from MSL 4.0:
Modelica.Electrical.Batteries.BatteryStackWithSensors.StackRC
is not correctly interpreted by OM.
In fact, it interprets its internal component "cell" as being an instance of
Battery.BaseClasses.BaseCellWithSensors
instead of
Battery.BatteryStacksWithSensors.CellRC
Change History (8)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Component: | *unknown* → New Instantiation |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Replying to casella:
@ceraolo, what do you mean by "it interprets"? Did you flatten the model using OMEdit and check individual equations?
I meant "visually interprets": when the diagram of StackRC is visualised, the icon of the cell is that of BaseCellWithSensors instead of CellRC and when hovering on it with the mouse the pathname Battery.BaseClasses.BaseCellWithSensors is reported.
I don't know whether this visual misinterpretation has consequences. I could not check since the model Batteries.Examples.CCCV_StackRC which uses BatteryStackWithSensors.StackRC does not simulate using NF (with OpenModelica v1.16.0-dev-611-g535ff3ffde ).
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
Component: | New Instantiation → NF API |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
OK, then it is a nfAPI issue.
comment:7 by , 19 months ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
@ceraolo, what do you mean by "it interprets"? Did you flatten the model using OMEdit and check individual equations?