Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #6201, comment 13
- Timestamp:
- 2020-11-24T18:31:29Z (4 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #6201, comment 13
initial v1 11 11 There are two exact solutions of this problem, {{{x = +/-sqrt(time)}}}. But, again, if you subtract {{{eps}}} from time in the first equation, or if you subtract {{{eps}}} from {{{y}}} in the second equation, '''boom'''! 12 12 13 Also in this case, you can see there is something fishy here because the Jacobian of the implicit equation {{{y = x^2}}} is zero when {{{time = 0}}}. Even if you don't solve it numerically, this singularity is a revealing sign of ill-posedness .13 Also in this case, you can see there is something fishy here because the Jacobian of the implicit equation {{{y = x^2}}} is zero when {{{time = 0}}}. Even if you don't solve it numerically, this singularity is a revealing sign of ill-posedness, because it tells you that the function is not locally invertible when {{{time = 0}}}.