Opened 4 years ago

Closed 3 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

#6207 closed defect (fixed)

Mixed under/overdetermined initialization problem in Buildings

Reported by: Francesco Casella Owned by: Karim Adbdelhak
Priority: critical Milestone: 1.19.0
Component: Backend Version:
Keywords: Cc: Michael Wetter

Description (last modified by Francesco Casella)

Please check Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.ActiveBeams.Examples.CoolingAndHeating. The backend reports

Error: The initialization problem of given system is mixed-determined.
It is under- as well as overdetermined and the mixed-determination-index is too high. [index > 10]

The root cause should be investigated and resolved.

Change History (11)

comment:1 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

Milestone: 1.17.01.18.0

comment:2 by Andreas Heuermann, 4 years ago

Duplicate of #6199?

comment:3 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

I'm not 100% sure, just gut feeling.

I'd keep both tickets open, when one is fixed it is trivial to click on the test report link and see if the other has been fixed as well.

comment:4 by Karim Adbdelhak, 4 years ago

I have a strong feeling that this might be connected to #6203 and is caused by missing bindings of parameters. If not caused it should at least be influenced by it, so we should resolve that other ticket first.

Last edited 4 years ago by Karim Adbdelhak (previous) (diff)

in reply to:  4 comment:5 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

Replying to Karim.Abdelhak:

I have a strong feeling that this might be connected to #6203 and is caused by missing bindings of parameters. If not caused it should at least be influenced by it, so we should resolve that other ticket first.

This would be fine, we'd solve mutiple issues in one shot.

comment:6 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

in reply to:  4 comment:7 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

Replying to Karim.Abdelhak:

I have a strong feeling that this might be connected to #6203 and is caused by missing bindings of parameters. If not caused it should at least be influenced by it, so we should resolve that other ticket first.

Unfortunately, fixing #6203 had no effect here.

in reply to:  2 comment:8 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

Replying to AnHeuermann:

Duplicate of #6199?

I also have this feeling.

Possibly also related to #6200

Last edited 4 years ago by Francesco Casella (previous) (diff)

comment:9 by Francesco Casella, 4 years ago

Cc: Michael Wetter added

comment:11 by Francesco Casella, 3 years ago

Milestone: 1.18.0

Ticket retargeted after milestone closed

comment:12 by Francesco Casella, 3 years ago

Milestone: 1.19.0
Priority: highcritical
Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

After PR #7903 was merged in, the examples reported in this ticket

successfully passes the backend phase.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.