Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#6427 closed defect (fixed)
MSL 4.0 dialog is shown even if MSL 4.0 is not installed
Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | Francesco Casella |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 1.17.0 |
Component: | OMEdit | Version: | 1.18.0-dev |
Keywords: | Cc: | Martin Sjölund, Adrian Pop |
Description
OMEdit on startup (at least on Linux) shows a dialog asking the user to either load the Modelica standard library version 3.2.3 or 4.0.0, regardless of whether the MSL 4.0 has been installed through the package manger or not.
If the user selects MSL 4.0, then OMEdit complains it can't find it. Closing and reopening OMedit no longer opens any dialog, and the user is left with an OMEdit that keeps failing to load the MSL 4.0 and can't use the MSL.
I could fix it by manually installing the MSL 4.0, but less knowledgeable users may not fix it so easily.
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Milestone: | → 1.17.0 |
---|
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Priority: | high → blocker |
---|
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 4 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Replying to adeas31:
No, why did you make this a blocker?
So that I don't forget about it.
We should close this with won't fix.
Remember this was my only concern when we discussed to implement this. And then you suggested to write a detailed description about it so we have this text already,
On Windows, both versions of the MSL are installed automatically by the installer. On Linux, follow the instructions on the OpenModelica download page.
I'm going to make that text more explicit. I know reading instructions is hard, let's try to be friendly :)
I'll take care of this myself.
comment:5 by , 4 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:6 by , 4 years ago
comment:8 by , 4 years ago
Yes the Qt tests fix is not ported to 1.17 so it fails sometimes. And there is no need to port it since its just for development.
No, why did you make this a blocker? We should close this with won't fix.
Remember this was my only concern when we discussed to implement this. And then you suggested to write a detailed description about it so we have this text already,