Timeline
2014-03-08:
- 13:27 Ticket #2344 (OMEdit - Erroneous display of two MSL 3.2.1. components) updated by
- I've checked with r19498. The diagrams are ok know. Just for …
2014-03-07:
- 13:21 Ticket #2344 (OMEdit - Erroneous display of two MSL 3.2.1. components) updated by
- My mistake. I forgot to merge the changes with the library source. It …
2014-03-06:
- 16:29 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) closed by
- invalid: perost, yes that was certainly the issue. I now see that a …
- 15:39 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- And […] Prints: […]
- 15:37 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- […] Prints: […]
- 15:32 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- Are you by any chance calling ExpressionSimplify.simplify1 instead of …
- 15:30 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- Sorry. I don't follow. What do you mean ExpressionSimplify doesn't do …
- 15:24 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- This is not about the flattening not working, it is about …
- 15:18 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- Replying to carlj@…: > You can't recreate the issue? Give …
- 15:03 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- You can't recreate the issue? Give ExpressionSimplify an expression on …
- 13:05 Ticket #2344 (OMEdit - Erroneous display of two MSL 3.2.1. components) updated by
- I've upgraded today to r19460. The problem is still there. I've …
- 12:37 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
- Could you please give a small model that shows this issue? The …
- 11:51 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) updated by
-
Cc changed
- 10:22 Ticket #2610 (Frontend - ExpressionSimplify can not handle y - x + x.) created by
- I have recently had issues with ExpressionSimplify not …
2014-03-04:
- 19:53 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
-
Description changed
- 19:48 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
-
Priority changed
Replying to adrpo: > Basically DAEUtil.traverseDAE + a … - 19:39 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- Replying to adrpo: > I think removedUnusedFunction phase …
- 19:39 Ticket #2607 (Frontend - Unparser omitts required parentheses) closed by
- fixed: Fixed in r19422.
- 18:13 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- That's true.
- 17:57 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- And to make things worse: Simplify can also remove function calls, …
- 17:56 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- Why? Some of the calls might not be inlined. Like LateInline called …
- 17:55 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- It's not possible to remove the function when you inlined one call. It …
- 17:53 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- Replying to sjoelund.se: > It's still a useful phase …
- 17:50 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- It's still a useful phase because it removes a lot of code when …
- 17:47 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- Basically DAEUtil.traverseDAE + a function gets a DAE.CALL and returns …
- 17:44 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- Should not be that hard to do. I can handle it after the Modelica …
- 17:28 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- I think removedUnusedFunction phase should always be run at the start …
- 15:45 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) updated by
- They are not missing functions: they are partial functions that should …
- 15:32 Ticket #2609 (Backend - BackendDAE modules "removedUnusedFunction" hides other bugs.) created by
- The module postOptModule "removedUnusedFunction" should be neutral in …
2014-03-03:
- 16:08 Ticket #2344 (OMEdit - Erroneous display of two MSL 3.2.1. components) closed by
- fixed: The problem was not in OMEdit. It was some old annotations in the …
- 13:00 Ticket #2608 (Frontend - Mechanics.MultiBody.Examples.Elementary.DoublePendulumInitTip fails) created by
- The model …
- 12:53 Ticket #2607 (Frontend - Unparser omitts required parentheses) created by
- Consider the following simple model: […] Enter it in OMEdit, …
2014-03-01:
- 08:07 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) closed by
- invalid: damn, is this damn cold :)
- 07:55 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) updated by
- Replying to adrpo: > a = c - bc + bd multiply c with (1 …
- 07:49 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) updated by
- I would say no: […]
- 07:43 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) updated by
- Well... Isn't it actually correct? […]
- 07:40 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) updated by
- Seems that: […]
- 07:39 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) updated by
- […] Gives […]
- 06:05 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) updated by
-
Cc changed
Question: can we look with the debugger at the solving process to see … - 06:01 Ticket #2606 (Backend - Bad equation solving (wrong symbolic manipulation)) created by
- Solving this system of equations: […] for b should result in: …
- 03:56 Ticket #2605 (Backend - Can MathML blocks be nested in the XML dump?) updated by
- I think you can commit it as you're the only one using dumpXMLDAE as …
- 03:52 Ticket #2605 (Backend - Can MathML blocks be nested in the XML dump?) created by
- Matt and I were looking at the XMLDump code this afternoon, and we …
Note:
See TracTimeline
for information about the timeline view.
