Opened 16 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#1080 new defect
Constraining type on redeclarations (from MathCore)
| Reported by: | krsta | Owned by: | krsta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 2.1.0 |
| Component: | New Instantiation | Version: | trunk |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Check that the constraining type on redeclarations is not violated.
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
| Cc: | removed |
|---|---|
| Component: | → New Instantiation |
| Milestone: | → Future |
| Version: | → trunk |
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
| Milestone: | Future → 2.0.0 |
|---|
comment:8 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.11.0 → 1.12.0 |
|---|
Milestone moved to 1.12.0 due to 1.11.0 already being released.
comment:9 by , 7 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.12.0 → Future |
|---|
The milestone of this ticket has been reassigned to "Future".
If you think the issue is still valid and relevant for you, please select milestone 1.13.0 for back-end, code generation and run-time issues, or 2.0.0 for front-end issues.
If you are aware that the problem is no longer present, please select the milestone corresponding to the version of OMC you used to check that, and set the status to "worksforme".
In both cases, a short informative comment would be welcome.
follow-up: 11 comment:10 by , 6 years ago
| Milestone: | Future → 2.0.0 |
|---|
@perost, are we already doing that in the NF? If so, you may close this right away.
comment:11 by , 6 years ago
Replying to casella:
@perost, are we already doing that in the NF? If so, you may close this right away.
No, it's one of those things that are nice to have but not necessary for models to work. I absolutely plan on implementing it in the NF, but right now it's fairly low priority.
http://intranet/trac/mathmodelica/ticket/1211