Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#1814 new defect
Typechecker incorrectly unifies distinct types through polymorphic type variables
Reported by: | Owned by: | somebody | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | Future |
Component: | Frontend | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I finally managed to get this reproduction down to a manageable size. It can probably be minimized further but this should be good enough to see the issue. If it's unclear I can try to make it even smaller.
The issue is a unification that passes but should not, it ends up with me being able to pass a Tuple<Integer,Integer> as the argument to a function expecting Integer through the use of replaceable types. I had a similar issue earlier where I managed to construct a list where one of the elements was another list.
The issue stems from a bug in my code (using a tuple instead of an int) but it is hard to find and debug these bugs when the compiler accepts them.
Actual Output:
{true,true,true} true "" intEqual 1, 2284673025 false ""
Expected output:
{true,true,true} false "Some Type Error here"
test.mos:
setCommandLineOptions({"+d=rml,noevalfunc,failtrace","+g=MetaModelica","+showAnnotations"}); loadFile("test.mo"); getErrorString(); // First element Test.test(1, 1); getErrorString();
test.mo:
encapsulated package Collection replaceable type State subtypeof Any; replaceable type Element subtypeof Any; partial function Next input State state; output Element current; output State nextState; end Next; partial function IsEmpty input State state; output Boolean empty; end IsEmpty; partial function Equality<A> input A x; input A y; output Boolean isEqual; end Equality; function eq<A> input Next next; input Equality equalityFunction; input A element; input State it; output Boolean res; protected // Side note: Element is unified with A implicitly here, but if this line is changed to // A currentElement; // an error is thrown: // Type mismatch in pattern currentElement\n actual type: polymorphic<A>\n expected type:\n polymorphic<Element> Element currentElement; algorithm // call next, which will be Test.next in the test (currentElement, _) := next(it); res := equalityFunction(element, currentElement); end eq; end Collection; package Test protected import Collection.{eq}; function intEqual input Integer x; input Integer y; output Boolean equal; algorithm // This line prints x correctly, but y is a tuple and its address (?) is printed. print("intEqual\n" +& intString(x) +& ", " +& intString(y) +& "\n"); equal := x == y; end intEqual; function next input Integer it; output Tuple<Integer,Integer> currentElement; output Integer nextIt; algorithm // Incorrectly return a tuple even though intEqual(Int,Int) => Bool and not intEqual(Int,Tuple<Int,Int>) => Bool currentElement := (it, it); nextIt := it; end next; function test input Integer element; input Integer i; output Boolean res; algorithm res := Collection.eq(next, intEqual, element, i); // fails properly // res := intEqual(element, (element,element)); end test; end Test;
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.0 → 2.0.0 |
---|
comment:7 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | 1.11.0 → 1.12.0 |
---|
Milestone moved to 1.12.0 due to 1.11.0 already being released.
comment:8 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 1.12.0 → Future |
---|
The milestone of this ticket has been reassigned to "Future".
If you think the issue is still valid and relevant for you, please select milestone 1.13.0 for back-end, code generation and run-time issues, or 2.0.0 for front-end issues.
If you are aware that the problem is no longer present, please select the milestone corresponding to the version of OMC you used to check that, and set the status to "worksforme".
In both cases, a short informative comment would be welcome.
I worked on another bug report, which looks like it's the same issue: