Opened 12 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#2384 closed defect (worksforme)
lookup of functions through instance name combined with inner/outer
| Reported by: | Peter Aronsson | Owned by: | somebody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | critical | Milestone: | 1.13.0 |
| Component: | Frontend | Version: | trunk |
| Keywords: | adrpo | Cc: |
Description
Lookup of functions through instance name combined with inner/outer components doesn't work.
Example:
package MissingInnerInherit
partial function basefoo
input Real x;
output Real y;
end basefoo;
function foo2
input Real x;
output Real y;
algorithm
y := x+1;
end foo2;
model PartialBase
replaceable function foo=basefoo;
end PartialBase;
model Base
extends PartialBase(redeclare function foo=foo2);
end Base;
model BaseTest
inner Base base;
end BaseTest;
model Test "run this one"
C c;
extends BaseTest;
end Test;
model C
outer PartialBase base;
Real x;
equation
x=base.foo(time);
end C;
end MissingInnerInherit;
This construct is used in the commercial libraries VehicleInterfaces and PowerTrain
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.0 → 1.9.1 |
|---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 |
|---|
This ticket was not closed for 1.9.1, which has now been released. It was batch modified for milestone 1.9.2 (but maybe an empty milestone was more appropriate; feel free to change it).
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.2 → 1.9.3 |
|---|
Milestone changed to 1.9.3 since 1.9.2 was released.
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.11.0 → 1.12.0 |
|---|
Milestone moved to 1.12.0 due to 1.11.0 already being released.
comment:9 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.12.0 → Future |
|---|
The milestone of this ticket has been reassigned to "Future".
If you think the issue is still valid and relevant for you, please select milestone 1.13.0 for back-end, code generation and run-time issues, or 2.0.0 for front-end issues.
If you are aware that the problem is no longer present, please select the milestone corresponding to the version of OMC you used to check that, and set the status to "worksforme".
In both cases, a short informative comment would be welcome.
comment:10 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | Future → 1.13.0 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → worksforme |
| Status: | new → closed |
Works in v1.13.0-dev-226-ga72f165

Postponed until 1.9.1