Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#2443 new defect
Bootstrapped compiler wish list
Reported by: | Adrian Pop | Owned by: | Martin Sjölund |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Future |
Component: | MetaModelica | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | Cc: | Per Östlund, Martin Sjölund, Peter Fritzson |
Description
Here is a list of what me and Per talked about:
- Include the uniontype path to the uniontype record, i.e. Abyn.Path.IDENT
- Make it possible to use Absyn.Path.IDENT.name instead of matching for it. Make also possible to use Absyn.Path.IDENT.name = x; This will make writing of set/get functions much easier.
- Support anonymous records from uniontypes in crefs or paths, i.e. DAE.Equation._.info = newInfo; This will bind the component named info form any record inside DAE.Equation to newInfo;
- Support opaque types and type methods. I.e.
package P type X protected type Name; function fGet(Name) => something; function fSet(Name) => something; end X; end P;
Add more here if you want to.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 |
---|
This ticket was not closed for 1.9.1, which has now been released. It was batch modified for milestone 1.9.2 (but maybe an empty milestone was more appropriate; feel free to change it).
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.2 → 1.9.3 |
---|
Milestone changed to 1.9.3 since 1.9.2 was released.
comment:8 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | 1.11.0 → 1.12.0 |
---|
Milestone moved to 1.12.0 due to 1.11.0 already being released.
comment:9 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 1.12.0 → Future |
---|
The milestone of this ticket has been reassigned to "Future".
If you think the issue is still valid and relevant for you, please select milestone 1.13.0 for back-end, code generation and run-time issues, or 2.0.0 for front-end issues.
If you are aware that the problem is no longer present, please select the milestone corresponding to the version of OMC you used to check that, and set the status to "worksforme".
In both cases, a short informative comment would be welcome.
A comment about point 4. I would like to be able to instantiate X, and then use X to access to functions associated with X. E.g.: