#2485 closed defect (fixed)
Redeclaration interpreted wrong with array dimensions
Reported by: | Christoph Höger | Owned by: | Adrian Pop |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.16.0 |
Component: | Frontend | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
The following testcase is legal (according to section 7.3 of the Modelica spec p.73, last line):
model Test2 model SomeComponent parameter Real x; end SomeComponent; model SomeOtherComponent parameter Real x; end SomeOtherComponent; model User1 replaceable SomeComponent[3] c(x = {1,2,3}); end User1; model User2 User1 u(redeclare SomeOtherComponent c); end User2; User2 u; parameter Real x = u.u.c[3].x; end Test2;
omc rejects it because it treats the redeclaration literally.
As a side-note: omc's interpretation of the redeclaration is an incompatible modification anyway (since X is never a subtype of X[:]).
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Component: | Backend → Frontend |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → accepted |
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 |
---|
This ticket was not closed for 1.9.1, which has now been released. It was batch modified for milestone 1.9.2 (but maybe an empty milestone was more appropriate; feel free to change it).
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.2 → 1.9.3 |
---|
Milestone changed to 1.9.3 since 1.9.2 was released.
comment:9 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | 1.11.0 → 1.12.0 |
---|
Milestone moved to 1.12.0 due to 1.11.0 already being released.
comment:10 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 1.12.0 → Future |
---|
The milestone of this ticket has been reassigned to "Future".
If you think the issue is still valid and relevant for you, please select milestone 1.13.0 for back-end, code generation and run-time issues, or 2.0.0 for front-end issues.
If you are aware that the problem is no longer present, please select the milestone corresponding to the version of OMC you used to check that, and set the status to "worksforme".
In both cases, a short informative comment would be welcome.
comment:11 by , 4 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
Works fine in both the old and the new frontend.
comment:12 by , 4 years ago
Milestone: | Future → 1.16.0 |
---|
Yeah, we probably do not use the dimensions from the original component. Should be an easy fix.