Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#5028 new enhancement
Add readDerivatives to readSimulationResultVars() API function
| Reported by: | Francesco Casella | Owned by: | Martin Sjölund |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Interactive Environment | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | Adrian Pop |
Description
I am using variable filters on simulate() and the filterSimulationResults() API functions to select the reference variables for the ScalableTestSuite. The filter regexp and the options of filterSimulationResults allows me to select some representative variables and to get rid of parameters and description strings. However, I could not find a viable way to get rid of the der() variables, which are often noisy and generate false negatives, see e.g. this report.
Could you please add one more input to readSimulationResultVars
input Boolean readDerivatives = true;
that indicates whether or not derivative names should be included in the output?
I guess this would be very useful in general when processing simulation output for testing.
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.13.0 → 1.14.0 |
|---|
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.14.0 → 1.16.0 |
|---|
Releasing 1.14.0 which is stable and has many improvements w.r.t. 1.13.2. This issue is rescheduled to 1.16.0
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.17.0 → 1.18.0 |
|---|
Retargeted to 1.18.0 because of 1.17.0 timed release.
Rescheduled to 1.14.0 after 1.13.0 releasee