Opened 6 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#5534 closed defect (fixed)
NF fails checkModel on an otherwise sane model
Reported by: | Francesco Casella | Owned by: | Per Östlund |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | 1.14.0 |
Component: | New Instantiation | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | Andrea Bartolini, buchner@… |
Description
Please load the attached package in OMEdit and open TestFlexiblePipeRCFilling
. With -d=newInst
the model is correctly instantiated and simulated. However, when checking the model, I get this error:
[1] 10:55:16 Translation Error Internal error Instantiation of NewFEbug.TestFlexiblePipeRCFilling failed with no error message.
Attachments (2)
Change History (12)
by , 6 years ago
Attachment: | NewFEbug.mo added |
---|
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
Component: | *unknown* → New Instantiation |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
The issue is back...
Please load the attached package NewFEbug1.mo
in OMEdit (it includes a new version of the previous attached model of flexible pipe) and open again TestFlexiblePipeRCFilling
.
With -d=newInst the model is correctly instantiated and simulated. However, when checking the model, I get again this error:
[1] 16:58:49 Translation Error Internal error Instantiation of NewFEbug1.TestFlexiblePipeRCFilling failed with no error message.
OMEdit - OpenModelica Connection Editor
Connected to OpenModelica 1.14.0~dev-26610-gea7fc62
Sysop Ubuntu 1604
by , 5 years ago
Attachment: | NewFEbug1.mo added |
---|
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
The issue with the new model is the same as before, the workaround of not evaluating most structural parameters to make the unit checking work is causing issues since some structural parameters that really need to be evaluated aren't.
I want to fix this properly, which means rewriting the unit checking to use the NF data structures so that we can do unit checking earlier and get rid of these workarounds. It's not that much work really, I've already rewritten about half of it by now. Unfortunately it doesn't look like I'll be able to finish it today though, and I'll be on vacation for the next month.
A possible workaround if you want to check the model right now is to change the parameter FlexiblePipeRC.N
to a constant, to make sure it's evaluated even when using checkModel (adding annotation(Evaluate = true)
is not enough).
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
Thanks Per,
I'll use the workaround till you complete the new unit checking.
Don't worry about the schedule... have a good vacation :)
comment:8 by , 5 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:9 by , 5 years ago
The new unit checking has now been implemented in 1b470a5, and the NF now does unit checking before the constant evaluation module is called. There is thus no longer any need for the workaround for checkModel in the constant evaluation, so this issue should no longer occur.
comment:10 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Fixed in 98e4980.
The issue was a previous change made to fix issues with the unit checking, by not evaluating as much of the model when doing checkModel. This caused scalarization issues with some start attributes in the given model, so I changed it so that we always evaluate structural parameters in type attributes.
Maybe there's some better way of handling it to avoid such evaluation, but this was just a one line fix so we can easily change it later if needed.