Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#2498 new defect
simulation fails with measureTime=true
Reported by: | Volker Waurich | Owned by: | Martin Sjölund |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Future |
Component: | Run-time | Version: | trunk |
Keywords: | measureTime | Cc: | Willi Braun, Lennart Ochel |
Description
Hi,
While running the msl 3.2 with measureTime=true some models are
failing when simulated. Its always because an assert was called, like in Modelica.Blocks.Examples.Filter :
assert | assert | Referenced 'CriticalDamping.cr' that was not declared as <variable>
Here the variable CriticalDamping.cr is actually an array and possibly occurs just as CriticalDamping[i] in the variables and therefore cannot be found.
This assert comes from
SimulationRuntime/c/simulation/simulation_info_xml.c line 72.
The if where the measureTime flag is checked is in
startNonInteractiveSimulation i.e. in simulation_runtime.cpp line 519.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 |
---|
This ticket was not closed for 1.9.1, which has now been released. It was batch modified for milestone 1.9.2 (but maybe an empty milestone was more appropriate; feel free to change it).
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | 1.9.2 → 1.9.3 |
---|
Milestone changed to 1.9.3 since 1.9.2 was released.
comment:8 by , 8 years ago
Milestone: | 1.11.0 → 1.12.0 |
---|
Milestone moved to 1.12.0 due to 1.11.0 already being released.
comment:9 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | 1.12.0 → Future |
---|
The milestone of this ticket has been reassigned to "Future".
If you think the issue is still valid and relevant for you, please select milestone 1.13.0 for back-end, code generation and run-time issues, or 2.0.0 for front-end issues.
If you are aware that the problem is no longer present, please select the milestone corresponding to the version of OMC you used to check that, and set the status to "worksforme".
In both cases, a short informative comment would be welcome.
This was fixed in r18448 so simulations do not crash by adding a
<variable>
tag as a copy of the first element but with a different name.The debugger will probably not work satisfactory. It seems that the SIMVAR does not contain information about the length of the array. So I cannot expand it to point to all its children or vice-versa. So you would have no logical link between
cr
andcr[1]
among the dependencies (so if an equation depends oncr[1]
, and this is defined only in an equation assigning tocr
, you would not find this in the debugger).Can Lennart or Willi add the required functionality (dimensions of the array) to the SimCode?