Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#2899 closed defect (fixed)
Wrong number of equations in expandable connectors model
| Reported by: | Owned by: | somebody | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.9.2 |
| Component: | Frontend | Version: | trunk |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
See the attached model. It contains an example with external connectors and a subbus and a control bus. The equations should be the same as the variables, but they are not.
This is a very common use of the expandable connectors in some libraries.
Attachments (2)
Change History (10)
by , 10 years ago
| Attachment: | TestModelTotal.mo added |
|---|
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
| Component: | Unknown → Frontend |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | Future → 1.9.1 |
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
I have a new case in which the count of equations and variables seems to be wrong in OM r24023.
I will attach it as "EquationCount.mo". I will also reopen this ticket. I apologise in advance in case it is my mistake.
by , 10 years ago
| Attachment: | EquationCount.mo added |
|---|
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
| Milestone: | 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | fixed |
| Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:7 by , 10 years ago
Well, it was my mistake.
I trusted Dymola, but I had a large model in which I used a variable "pow" taken from a connector that nobody put into. That model was therefore faulty, even though that Dymola accepted it as balanced (it simulated, and during the simulation variable power was constantly zero).
Trying to simplify that model I created EquationCount that I uploaded; but that one was nearly useless for the purpose.
So, I'm going to close this ticket again.
comment:8 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
test model for expandable connectors