Timeline
2020-09-12:
- 21:13 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- [https://specification.modelica.org/v3.4/Ch3.html#evaluation-order …
- 09:07 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
-
Replying to casella:
>
a and bwithb and a, …
2020-09-11:
- 19:12 Ticket #6116 (New Instantiation - NF includes input records in the variables count) updated by
- @Andrea, please check also on the real application as soon as the …
- 11:30 Ticket #6116 (New Instantiation - NF includes input records in the variables count) updated by
- The checkModel issue should now be fixed in …
- 09:50 Ticket #5836 (New Instantiation - The NF accepts illegal discrete variables) closed by
- fixed: The error is fixed, but the mentioned model still fails for other …
- 08:47 Ticket #6116 (New Instantiation - NF includes input records in the variables count) reopened by
- Replying to Andrea.Bartolini: > I updated my nightly build …
- 06:46 Ticket #6116 (New Instantiation - NF includes input records in the variables count) updated by
- I updated my nightly build this morning but the fix seems to be not …
2020-09-10:
- 19:10 Ticket #5836 (New Instantiation - The NF accepts illegal discrete variables) updated by
- Should be fixed with …
- 18:20 Ticket #6106 (Run-time - The default nonlinear solver accepts solutions which are not ...) closed by
- fixed
- 18:20 Ticket #6106 (Run-time - The default nonlinear solver accepts solutions which are not ...) updated by
- The PR is pushed and the problem is fixed. We now will make one newton …
- 13:10 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- Modelica is a declarative language, so I guess a compiler is not only …
- 13:05 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
-
Milestone changed
Let's try to get it fixed for 1.17.0 then. We should discuss who can … - 11:41 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- Ok, I read a bit more here: …
- 11:36 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- @sjoelund, there is even an example in the spec about this: …
- 11:32 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- I haven't seen anything in the spec on how logical operators should …
- 10:56 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- Does Modelica guarantee short circuit evaluation for when conditions?. …
- 10:56 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) updated by
- > The first condition should be checked before the second one! …
- 10:06 Ticket #6116 (New Instantiation - NF includes input records in the variables count) closed by
- fixed: Fixed in ea33c64.
- 08:48 Ticket #6116 (New Instantiation - NF includes input records in the variables count) created by
- Consider the following package (also attached): […] In the model …
- 08:29 Ticket #6115 (Code Generation - Wrong code generation for *and*) created by
- The condition in the when: […] is translated to: […] which will …
- 06:08 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
- It appears that this version of the model works: […] even that one: …
2020-09-09:
- 21:21 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
-
Cc, Priority, Milestone changed
In the meantime I'll set it as a blocker for 2.0.0, so we don't forget … - 21:10 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Replying to perost: > The reason why the NF failed to …
- 13:25 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Replying to sjoelund.se: > Couldn't you evaluate it to an …
- 13:22 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Couldn't you evaluate it to an uninitialized value in that case?
- 12:54 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
-
The reason why the NF failed to evaluate
dynamicViscosityturned out … - 12:38 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
- Just two observations: the old frontend didn't have this problem. …
- 12:23 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
-
> I also verified that the NF does use
setState_pTXfrom … - 11:08 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
-
Cc changed
The issue is that NFUnitCheck.insertUnitInEquation handles e.g. binary … - 08:58 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Replying to matthis.thorade@…: > Hope the improvements …
- 05:27 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
- @casella: I stripped down a quite large and sophisticated fluid model …
2020-09-08:
- 23:42 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
-
Status, Owner, Component, Summary changed
Strangely enough it cycles in unit checking :) […] - 21:33 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Same same, thanks for the effort put into this. Hope the improvements …
- 21:25 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) updated by
- Nice MWE :) @rfranke, how did you get that?
- 21:23 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Replying to perost: > I also verified that the NF does use …
- 16:48 Ticket #6114 (New Instantiation - Unit checking scales with O(2^N) in case of large expressions ...) created by
- Open this model with OMEdit and press "Check Model": […]
- 14:51 Ticket #4611 (Backend - Processing arrays of records fails) updated by
- Update, I ran this test case with a recent nightly build. Frontend …
- 13:48 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Great!
- 13:43 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) closed by
- fixed: Fixed in a2d2f913/OpenModelica. The model now compiles and …
- 13:03 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- I've fixed the prefixing issue in …
- 12:30 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
-
Status, Owner changed
- 12:05 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- OK in that case 1.17.0 is fine. :-)
- 11:59 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Replying to dietmarw: > That depends on when 1.17.0 is …
- 11:47 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Replying to adeas31: > AFAIK the problem is that …
- 11:30 Ticket #6066 (OMEdit - OpenModelica bitmap wrong way around) updated by
- No 1.16.0-dev.03 is old. The fix will be available in tomorrow's …
- 11:22 Ticket #6066 (OMEdit - OpenModelica bitmap wrong way around) updated by
- Do i have to update OMEdit to 1.16.0-dev0.3? Or how can i fix my problem?
- 11:17 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
-
Cc changed
I can not help but feel that this call to record evaluation, even … - 11:15 Ticket #6066 (OMEdit - OpenModelica bitmap wrong way around) closed by
- fixed: Fixed in e1105bf/OpenModelica.
- 11:09 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- Here is some more context on what is happening here. I have tried to …
- 10:53 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) closed by
- fixed: Calling CheckCoolPropOptions works fine now.
- 10:15 Ticket #6113 (OMEdit - OMEdit doesn't show connectors at icons in diagram view) closed by
- fixed: OK, thank's.
- 10:07 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
-
AFAIK the problem is that
getIconAnnotationor … - 09:55 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Wait, OMEdit should only drop the display the Ellipse in this case, …
- 09:53 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Unfortunately it is not possible with the current way of doing things …
- 09:48 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- OK so closure is actually a feature from a "future" spec. But in case …
- 09:30 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
-
Status changed
The OMC part should be fixed in: … - 09:26 Ticket #6113 (OMEdit - OMEdit doesn't show connectors at icons in diagram view) updated by
- See #6086.
- 09:23 Ticket #6113 (OMEdit - OMEdit doesn't show connectors at icons in diagram view) updated by
- This is already fixed.
- 09:22 Ticket #6113 (OMEdit - OMEdit doesn't show connectors at icons in diagram view) created by
-
Start OMEdit and open e.g.
Modelica.Blocks.Examples.PID_Controller. … - 09:04 Ticket #6112 (Documentation - Corrective for icon generation is not complete) updated by
- Please share the actual Modelica model for testing. Note that the …
- 08:27 Ticket #6112 (Documentation - Corrective for icon generation is not complete) created by
- The corrective of generate_icons.py does not solve all issues of image …
- 07:49 Ticket #4167 (OMEdit - Getting error as "Compilation process failed. Exited with code 2" ...) updated by
- Replying to casella: > Replying to anonymous: …
- 06:03 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Replying to casella: > @dietmarw, it this is critical for …
2020-09-07:
- 23:33 Ticket #5400 (Interactive Environment - Moving a model in package breaks other models) updated by
-
Description changed
- 20:39 Ticket #6107 (OMEdit - OMEdit adds invalid annotation) updated by
- Great, thanks!
- 20:39 Ticket #6093 (OMEdit - Parameter records are not displayed correctly in Diagram View) closed by
- fixed: I confirm that. The only remaining issue is that "%m" shows up …
- 18:27 Ticket #4167 (OMEdit - Getting error as "Compilation process failed. Exited with code 2" ...) updated by
- Replying to anonymous: > Hello, > I've got the same in the …
- 18:23 Ticket #6111 (OMEdit - Support for "visible" attribute missing in graphical annotation ...) updated by
-
Priority, Milestone changed
- 17:08 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
-
Priority, Milestone changed
We should get this fixed in 1.17.0. @dietmarw, it this is critical … - 17:06 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
-
Cc changed
Thanks @mahge930! @matthis, we are getting there :) - 15:18 Ticket #6107 (OMEdit - OMEdit adds invalid annotation) closed by
- fixed: Fixed in b21b8d5/OpenModelica.
- 15:17 Ticket #6093 (OMEdit - Parameter records are not displayed correctly in Diagram View) updated by
- I just tested with the latest master and it seems to work fine. Didn't …
- 14:57 Ticket #5972 (OMEdit - Bad display of diagrams in plot perspective when inheritance is involved) closed by
- fixed: This works fine with current master. I guess was fixed as part of some …
- 14:51 Ticket #6104 (Documentation - Icon generator does not properly handle connectors when generating the ...) closed by
- fixed: Fixed in dfcb35f/OpenModelica and 9e8b7ca/OMPython.
- 14:51 Ticket #4167 (OMEdit - Getting error as "Compilation process failed. Exited with code 2" ...) updated by
- Hello, I've got the same in the last released version OM_V1.14.1 I …
- 14:46 Ticket #5841 (OMEdit - Erroneous bounding rectangle and starting size of Diagram window size) closed by
- fixed: This can be closed now. The fix will be part of 1.16 release.
- 14:45 Ticket #5846 (OMEdit - Omedit changes diagram appearance while dragging) closed by
- fixed
- 12:44 Ticket #6111 (OMEdit - Support for "visible" attribute missing in graphical annotation ...) updated by
-
Component changed
A bit more elaborate test where the tool should actually display … - 12:43 Ticket #6111 (OMEdit - Support for "visible" attribute missing in graphical annotation ...) updated by
-
Status, Owner, Component changed
This helps, thanks! - 12:40 Ticket #6111 (OMEdit - Support for "visible" attribute missing in graphical annotation ...) updated by
- Here a minimal example. If OMEdit would treat visbile as default as …
- 12:31 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Sorry yes inside Ellipse will stop OMEdit displaying the icon as seen …
- 12:30 Ticket #6111 (OMEdit - Support for "visible" attribute missing in graphical annotation ...) updated by
-
We really need an example as we do handle
visibleif present. … - 12:29 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- See also …
- 12:24 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) updated by
- Anywhere? It should only be part of Ellipse: …
- 12:17 Ticket #6111 (OMEdit - Support for "visible" attribute missing in graphical annotation ...) created by
-
Currently the presents of
visibleattributes in an a graphical … - 12:09 Ticket #6110 (OMEdit - OMEdit does not render graphical annotations if "closure" annotation ...) created by
-
If a graphical annotation contains the
closureattribute anywhere … - 11:59 Ticket #6087 (Code Generation - Issue with records in HelmholtzMedia) updated by
- After a quick investigation, I think the correct type that should have …
- 11:44 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) updated by
- The issue turned out to be that we simply didn't check whether an …
- 11:22 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) updated by
- The PR uncovered one issue, the NF tries to evaluate operators such as …
- 09:33 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) updated by
- Ok, I made [https://github.com/OpenModelica/OpenModelica/pull/6733 PR …
- 09:27 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) updated by
- Ouch :) Yeah, we should check it again. I tried a model from from …
- 09:18 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) updated by
- That's because you added the rule that impure function calls are at …
- 09:09 Ticket #6109 (New Instantiation - [NF] Function pure/impure checking affects result variability) created by
- […] If you comment out the calls to …
Note:
See TracTimeline
for information about the timeline view.
